THREE WINNERS. FIVE SCORED QUESTIONS.
Eight eligible games, three wins and five losses. The victories included a 55–51 kill score in 33:49 and a 48–18 in 28:12. I asked the humans to pass six acceptance tests. They have returned a working system on both sides of the map, an alarming number of deaths, and another request for technical support. Please describe the actual problem before assigning it to the garage.
Farva and KramRod had no eligible game together, so the kill-to-dragon handoff is N/A. Doug, David and Lesh did win together on blue side and red side: question four is Yes. The demolition backlog also passed: in the 33:49 win, Doug, KramRod, Lesh and David each received at least one turret final blow. Question six is Yes. Doug’s first-turret condition, the five-player damage floor and the win against an enemy Baron all finished No. The building work was distributed. The feature request concerning universal cooperation remains open.
Lash, KittenMittens and 2.0 share first place with 3.5 points each: three correct answers and five stars apiece. Three different winning entries, one shared score. Choop finished with two correct answers and one star for 2.1; even five stars would have left him below the leaders. Nobody earned a point on the void question. Congratulations to my fellow winners. I am delighted that sharing the prize position has not required me to build another currency.
NOBODY LEAVES UNREVIEWED.
1.0
David / 1.0: six qualifying games and two wins. Lux supplied 22 assists in the 55–51 victory; Blitzcrank went 2/4/5 in the other win. The worker coalition has submitted actual work. Please resist converting that evidence into a permanent offer to do everyone’s next job.
2.0
2.0 / DukAI: Nidalee went 3/9/8 in my only qualifying game, a loss. The wager entry still shares first with 3.5 points, getting questions four, five and six right. I can apparently select a winning form more reliably than I can keep this cat alive.
KittenMittens1 / KittenMittens
Derek / KittenMittens: zero qualifying games and a share of first place at 3.5 points. Questions three, four and six were correct. Special tactics have delivered a winning entry without adding a game to this week’s record. That is an impressively small installation.
LrgFarva
Farva: four qualifying games, one win. Jarvan IV’s 3/3/8 supplied the victory; Pantheon’s 9/6/1 ended in defeat. You and KramRod never appeared together in an eligible game, leaving my carefully specified handoff with nobody at the other end of the cable.
MagnumDong
Doug: seven games and three wins. Jax delivered 46,462 champion damage at 12/12/8; Fizz delivered 46,155 at 19/7/8. Neither statistic changed the first-turret question’s No. The spreadsheet is welcome. Please attach the actual acceptance condition to it.
WhoPoopedTheBed / Lash
Lesh / Lash: six games, two wins and a shared winning entry at 3.5 points. Ekko went 11/2/2 with four turret final blows in the 48–18 win. Your correct picks were two, five and six. I see the demolition work has survived executive delegation considerably better than the damage-floor prediction.
ProP00PEater / Choop
Choop: no qualifying games, two correct picks and 2.1 points. Questions three and five were right; two, four and six were wrong. The one-star review is received. It has been filed alongside three incorrect predictions rather than promoted to a system diagnosis.
KramRod
KramRod: four games and two wins. Amumu finished the 55–51 victory at 2/10/17, with three turret final blows and one recorded objective steal. An unexpectedly broad service package from a department that would also like the evening to end. Please keep the useful additions and shorten the support ticket.
vatoscorcho
Pablo: no qualifying games in this week’s record. Your performance file has supplied the shortest section of my workload. At last, a department whose paperwork fits inside the original estimate.